ABSTRACT
Background: The epidemic of diabetes mellitus is rising globally due to urbanization, population growth, aging, obesity and sedentary life style. Treatment satisfaction is defined as the individual’s rating of important attributes of the process and outcomes of his/her treatment experience and it represents an important outcome as it is related to adherence and willingness to continue treatment.Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive hospital-based study was conducted at endocrinology OPD attached to Pt. B.D. Sharma PGIMS Rohtak, Haryana from May 2014 to April 2015. Five hundred diabetics (type 1 and 2) were recruited for the study. Patients registered on the day of interview were selected using systematic random sampling. A predesigned, pretested, semi-structured schedule which included socio-demographic variables of the study subjects along with information about family history of diabetes was filled by interviewing the study subjects in their vernacular language individually. DiabMedSat was used to assess the treatment satisfaction.Results: Nearly two third of the study participants were treated on oral hypoglycaemic agents (76.2%) followed by subjects treated on insulin+OHA (21.4%). 2.4% of the study subjects were on treatment with insulin alone. 87.8% of female subjects were satisfied with their treatment as compared to 86.3% of their male counterparts.Conclusions: Treatment satisfaction has a positive influence on quality of life of the study subjects as those who are satisfied tend to better adhere to their drug regimen thereby achieving a desirable glycaemic control and averting the complications associated with the disease thereby leading to a healthier life.
ABSTRACT
Background & objectives: Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is known to vary widely depending on the region of the country, dietary habits, and socio-economic status. This study was undertaken to determine the prevalence of GDM and risk factors associated with it, in women attending an antenatal care (ANC) clinic at a tertiary care hospital in Haryana. Methods: This study enrolled women, with their estimated gestational age between 24th and 28th week, attending antenatal care (ANC) clinic at a tertiary care hospital in Rohtak. After informing, women who consented to participate were given a standardized 2-h 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). A proforma containing general information on demographic characteristics, socio-economic status, education level, parity, family history of diabetes and/or hypertension and past history of GDM was filled up. American Diabetes Association (ADA) criteria for 75 g 2-h OGTT was used for diagnosing GDM. Results: A total of 607 women participated in the study and GDM was diagnosed in 43 (7.1%) women. A single abnormal value was observed in additional 66 (10.87%) women. On bivariate analysis risk factors found to be significantly associated with GDM were age, educational level, socio-economic status, pre-pregnancy weight and BMI, weight gain, acanthosis nigricans, family history of diabetes or hypertension and past history of GDM but on multivariate analysis only upper middle class and presence of acanthosis nigricans were found to be significantly associated with GDM. Interpretation & conclusions: The prevalence of GDM was found to be 7.1 per cent in a tertiary care hospital in Haryana. Appropriate interventions are required for control and risk factor modifications.